Aug 31 2010

I am preaching this Sunday the 5th

The Meaning of Life

Creative Commons License photo credit: a4gpa

- The Other Side -

Someone tells you a story and you think you have all the facts, but then someone else with a raised hand says, “now, let me tell you the other side” and a whole new picture begins to form in your head.

Jesus comes along and says, “try the other side” – “try the right side” – the side of authority, try things my way – try the Jesus approach… and what happens?

Perhaps the traditional and the “been there done that” is coming up with diddly squat and you look around and wonder – well what would happen if we sailed off to deeper waters? What would happen if we tried things just a bit differently?

I think then we begin to dwell in the places that are holy and new and maybe the places and faces are unfamiliar and frightening, but the reward is… well.. unimaginable.

This is what I want to explore this Sunday…

Yes,  it’s true – some pastor was crazy enough to relinquish his pulpit to me and I will be preaching Sunday the 5th at 7pm at the Ethos service at Neighborhood Christian Fellowship in Covina California. (directions and address at the web site). You can also RSVP on the facebook page.

Please retweet this and repost this as much as possible, I would love to pack the place out with new and exciting faces, and if you are a reader of this blog, I would certainly love to meet you. Even if you can’t make it, I would love it if you could help me promote it.   Of course it will be recorded and I will post the sermon here after the 5th, but I would love to see everyone there.

Thank you

p.s. we need a drummer


Aug 22 2010

Ask Anything

What is this all about?
Creative Commons License photo credit: antwerpenR

It seems when you ask a group of people of any age for their spiritual questions, the ones that roll in are the same ones you always hear.

  • Why is there evil in the world?
  • What is God’s Will for my life?
  • What is Heaven like?
  • Is Jesus coming back soon?
  • Can Satan hear my prayers?

And unless you’re R.C. Sproul it seems many of those questions still seem to be unanswerable to the average pew sitter.

Many times a good ploy from the pastor is to do a “ask me any question” series. I remember my previous pastor did it a year ago, he called it “Ask Dr. Bob” and he wore a Doctor’s lab coat. We have done it in youth group before and it’s mostly either questions about sex, or heaven or sex in heaven.

Well recently my Pastor, Chris Lewis has taken it upon himself to answer these age old questions and I can not begin to tell you how thorough and simple he has made these talks. I don’t normally pimp other pastor’s work, but this series is certainly worth a listen. Some of these sermons are literally the BEST I have ever heard on the subject.

1. Can I trust the Bible?

2. Who’s Afraid of the Holy Spirit?

3. Can You Lose Your Salvation? Armenian vs. Calvinism

4. What God hath joined together - Divorce

(I would also give Rob Bell’s recent Divorce sermon a listen)

5. Just Do Something – How can you know God’s Will?


Aug 11 2010

I got a peaceful, uneasy feeling…

Malaise
Creative Commons License photo credit: Stephen Cummings

I got “dissed” the other day for claiming I was in a theological “malaise.” This came from my header (a sentence I doubt many people read). It states “reciprocal ecclesiology in a pseudo post-modern malaise.” And it’s basically a lot of fancy words all strung together that essentially says “I don’t know how comfortable I am sitting in the now after-modern church, and this is my take on how I see it.”

A more direct translation might be: A measuring of church doctrine in a not real after contemporary general uneasiness

Malaise is an out of sorts feeling, sometimes its described as those moments or days right before you get really sick. And certainly the now modern.. current.. (however you want to say it) church doesn’t make me “sick.” But the future certainly adds a general sense of unbalance and dizziness. That’s not a critique or a bash, I think anyone who is honest about the global church in the here and now would say the same thing.

And don’t get me wrong, I love the church, I am excited about its future and the continuing advancement of the Kingdom of God – it’s just that these are some strange times to be living in. Of course the Lord is with us, the church will not grow apostate, the bride of Christ will always shine, but these next few years will be akin to a toddler learning to walk for the first time. And as any parent can tell you – those months can keep you alert and a little worried.

Founding editor of the religion department at Publishers Weekly, Phyllis Tickle writes these words about this uncertain future of which I speak…

“Always without fail, the thing that gets lost early in the process of a reconfiguration is any clear and general understanding of who or what is to be used as the arbitrator of correct belief, action, and control… The Reformation,…was to answer the question… sola scriptura, scriptura sola… While we may laugh and say the divisiveness was Protestantism’s greatest gift to Christianity, ours is a somber joke. Demoninationalism is a disunity in the Body of Christ and, ironically, one that has a bloody history… Now, some five hundred years later, even many of the most die-hard Protestants among us have grown suspicious of “Scripture and Scripture only.” We question what the words mean – literally? Metaphorically? Actually? We even question which words do and do not belong in Scripture and the purity of the editorial line of decent of those that do. We begin to refer to Luther’s principle of “sola scriptura, scriptura sola” as having been little more than the creation of a paper pope in place of a flesh and blood one. And even as we speak, the authority that has been in place for five hundred years withers away in our hands.”

A new generation is beginning to ask questions and beginning to formulate a truly classic theology. Pastor Dan Kimball describes it as “vintage faith.” We are standing on the precipice of a new reformation, one that looks further back – beyond the Catholic or Roman influences and tries to tap the life vein that was originally Christ.

Tickle goes on to say, “The new Christianity of the Great Emergence must discover some authority base or delivery system and/or governing agency of its own. It must formulate—and soon—something other than Luther’s Sola Scriptura which, although used so well by the Great Reformation originally, is now seen as hopelessly outmoded or insufficient …”

That last sentence might scare you, but it shouldn’t. Because I think we use the bible so often to “correct” our lives and “prove” our motives that we never stop to reflect that the bible itself speaks of a more correct and a more true authority available to us.

John 14:15-17

“If you love me, you will obey what I command. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever— the Spirit of truth… the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.”

The counselor that will remind us and be with us forever is the Holy Spirit the living God.

Luther said “only the bible and the bible only” and we carry these heavy oversized books to church saying it’s “the word of God…” but what does John say?

John 1:1-5

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.”

The word of God who was here on earth since the beginning is Jesus the living God.

And this is no disrespect to the bible, I love the bible, am a teacher of the bible, own several bibles, could live on “sola scriptura, scriptura sola” for the rest of my natural life and be more than content.  But that’s the great thing about this new reformation… they don’t want just a heavy book anymore or worse… a relationship with a book or a life of reading a book.

No, they want to carry God in their pockets, feel God on their shoulders, speak God with their tongues, see God move in their lives and have a real relationship with a living, breathing, God.

I think this new reformation is going to begin to look at the Holy Sprit the way the early church did. Not as some ethereal mystery figure or discussion item in Christology classes, but as a vital source of strength, and power and interpretation and mediation.

And that is awesome!… but it also has me feeling a little sick to my stomach. Which might explain why some people were always falling to their knees or to their faces in the presence of God and his angels – a true direct interaction with the Holy should make us feel uncomfortable.

A malaise is a real and honest feeling to have.


Jul 10 2010

Church Peeves: Worship Ninjas

「Edo Wonderland」Sword Dance
Creative Commons License photo credit: -ratamahatta-

With over forty years experience being an avid and frequent church observer, both as someone who has been in front of and behind the scenes, I consider myself an expert in all things church related. So from time to time, I will be sitting in total communion with my Lord and something will “all uh sudden” erk me to no end. These are things/observances that take place (for some reason) in every church…none of us are safe.

Church Peeves: Worship Ninjas.

The pastor just delivered an amazing sermon and he can think of no better way to end it then by asking the entire congregation into a moment of prayer. How he knew ‘prayer’ was exactly how I wanted to respond to the teaching that morning, I will never know.  But only a few moments into this blessed moment and I hear rustling… movement… that’s when I know the worship ninjas have been deployed.

If you are ever brave enough to do it, you can crack a rogue eyelid open and catch one of them in movement. Like the elusive basalope, the worship ninja is rarely photographed and comes out only when everyone in the facility has closed their eyes. One by one they make their way to the stage and begin picking up their instruments with cat-like stealth so that when the Pastor says “Amen” no pause is noticed before the worship leader can say….

“All right we are just going to stand together and respond…”

As if we are all supposed to say…

“WHOA! How did you guys get on stage? Just a minute ago the pastor was alone and now there are seven of you! Did you guys master the transportation of matter in this church?”

Here is my question: When does the worship team get to pray? Are they handed secret instructions before service to pray alone during the last baseball analogy, or are they just supposed to ‘wing it.’ I guess that if you are serving in the church you technically don’t “need” to pray since you are probably one of those ‘I pray all the time’ types?

But the reality is, probably none of that is true. And it really doesn’t “bug me” that much, but can we really not have a moment of ‘pause’ between prayer and worship? Do we really need to ‘keep things moving’ with the slick and polish of a staged production?

I say let’s mix it up once in a while and let the worship kids ‘worship.’


May 17 2010

To love and to cherish from this day forward

The Bride's fabulous shoes

As a young man marries a young woman, so will your Builder marry you; as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride, so will your God rejoice over you.

~ Isaiah 62:5

Have you ever wondered why God refers to himself as the “the groom” (Matthew 25: 1-13) and his church as “the bride?” Why did he chose that imagery? What is God trying to tell us?

First, I guess you would have to think about what comes to mind when you think of a groom….not just a husband mind you, but a man “not yet a husband,” a man who is awaiting to be married.

To me, this brings to mind a God who is joyful, a God who is on fire with affection, and at the same time tender and sensitive to vulnerabilities.  A “bridegroom God” sees his fiancé as something radiant and beautiful and who longs for her with passion and anxiousness.

Wedding language is certainly poetic and romantic. It has a certain energy and feel about it, don’t you think?

But is this the same God we talk about at church?

Do you feel like a bride who is courted and wooed by her groom? Would you describe your church worship as “light-headed” or “captivating?” And yet we were created by a passionate God who longs for us and who wants us to long for him.

Many Christians today will use “buzzwords” to talk about church revival; they use words like “radical” and “extreme,” but what about “lovesick?” Can you remember ever being lovesick for someone? That’s when you’re so much in love that it physically hurts you to be apart.

We probably were lovesick once in our walk with God, so how do we reclaim that lovesick affection? I guess the same way a bride does with her groom – she has “encounters” with him (no, not those kind of “encounters”).

I think, as God’s bride, we should be excited about the days that we meet with him – and no, not just at “the end of days,” but each and every day that we come before him in praise and worship. Encountering God and escaping away from the cycle of everyday life will be what drives your passion for the creator.

And the good news is, you already know how to do it…

  • Prayer
  • Reading the scriptures
  • Worship
  • Tithing
  • Evangelism
  • Fellowship and the breaking of bread

We should all long to have our weekly (if not daily) rendezvous with the Lord!

Lord, may we be the prize of your heart and may we burn with passion as your cherished bride. Give us a heart for what you have a heart for and stir within us that lovesick drive that brings us back into your waiting arms. ~ Amen


May 5 2010

WDJTUTD?

Jesus!

I’m starting to wonder if there is a difference between being a Christian and being a follower of Jesus. And before you pass judgment on this article as something you have read before, hang on a tic. For the sake of explanation, I am going to define “Christian” as someone who is a typical church attender – this is someone who prays, reads the bible, is in a bible study, goes to church on Sunday, tries to obey the 10 commandments, tithes and earnestly tries to live a good life.

Becoming a Christian is easy.

John 6:28-29

Then they (the disciples) asked him (Jesus), “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

Jesus flat out says that the “works” of Salvation is simply belief in him. He repeats this in his infamous dialog with Nicodemus

John 3:16-17

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

This same idea is repeated in John 11:25-27, John 17:2-3, and Romans 10:13

And this almost becomes the “selling point” of Christianity; that becoming a Christian is as simple as three simple steps: belief, confession and acceptance. Each of us is saved by grace and the “work” Christ did at the cross.

But what about being a Jesus follower? A Jesus follower is usually defined as someone who tries to “live out the teachings of Jesus.” In other words when Christ said to “do” something – they try to do it (go figure). These would be things like: loving your enemies, caring for the people in the fringes of society, visiting those in prison, feeding the hungry and protecting the rights of widows and orphans.

So despite the fact that “doing things” doesn’t save us… Jesus did in fact tell us to “do things.” And even more surprisingly, Jesus didn’t tell us to do most of the things that Christians “do.”

So here is my segue…

Lately I have spent a lot of work on my résumé.

Since I have been out of work for so long, I tend to wonder if maybe my résumé is lacking (I have been accused of not selling myself well). So I pour over statistics and quotes wondering how best to “prove” I am the best man for the job. On any résumé you want to list your good works that will show someone who doesn’t know you – the evidence of your qualifications.

So think for a moment about some of the things that you would list on your Christian résumé. What “proves” you are a Christian?

  • You attend church meetings.
  • Lead a bible study
  • Read Beth Moore books
  • You’re on the fellowship committee
  • You preach sermons
  • You leave bible tracts for your waitress at restaurants.

You could certainly list many of those things to show your pastor or another believer the evidences of your “Christian” life. But what if the one reviewing our résumé was Jesus? Then what would you list?

What proves you follow Christ?

Because I would argue that becoming a Christian is easy, but being a Jesus follower is hard.

And I will be the first to admit: I rarely do any of those things that Jesus said to do. My life doesn’t interact much with prisons, or orphans or widows. Maybe once a month I come across a homeless person, and when that happens, I usually don’t have any cash on me and I have to shrug and apologize.

I wonder if that’s what Jesus would do to? Just shrug and say he was sorry.

I picture Jesus visiting my life for the week and he sits in the back of my Kia as I go about my daily routine.

Are we going to a prison now?” he asks excitedly.

No, we’re going to Trader Joes.” I smile. “We are out of milk.”

Well afterwards can we go to a bar?” Jesus asks. (Jesus ate and drank with sinners, remember?)

Um, we’re NOT going to a bar,” I sternly shake my head. “Do you know what kind of people hang out there?

But I am sure he DOES know who hangs out in bars… that’s why he associated with people who drank. And before you interject, TGI Fridays and Applebees are NOT bars.

Jesus purposefully put people in his life who needed him. Think about what all of these people have in common…

  • Prisoners
  • Drunks
  • Orphans
  • Widows
  • The hungry
  • The naked
  • The homeless

They all needed an outside force to enter into their lives to improve their situation. And because Jesus fed the hungry and healed the sick, because he filled the needs of the broken in his community, thousands would come out to see him.

I wonder how often churches create programs to fill the needs of those already within the church instead of programs that bring peace and wholeness to those on the outside? I wonder if Jesus came to my church he’d be sad that after the sermon I got in my car and went back home, because I know sometimes I am.

I am often reminded of what Jesus said in Matthew 28

“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.”

Jesus says a disciple isn’t someone who goes to church or tithes their ten percent. In the great commission he defines a disciple as someone “who obeys” his commands.


Apr 28 2010

This is your final call…

En Roma

Doesn’t the guy on the far right look like Jimmy Kimmel?

I have always wanted to be a Catholic priest. I think it’s becasue being a Protestant, there is no “badge” or uniform that identifies me as a pastor. Clerical collars are cool; and even Neo from the Matrix trilogy wears a cassock. The pope gets a hat, Monks get robes and Rabbis get tzit tzit. I was ordained as a Baptist minister and all I have to show for it is a certificate of ordination (and it looks stupid pinned to my shirt).

Believe me, if the Catholic church would start ordaining married priests, I’d be first in line. Sign me up for liturgy, rosaries, ancient prayers, marble statues and stained glass windows.  I actually think it would be fun to work in a church with a rich heritage; and I don’t think I am alone.

But sadly, many  Catholic parishes are losing their members, especially those parishioners between the ages of 18 and 35 (not surprisingly the same demographic leaving protestant churches), at alarming rates thereby causing the American Catholic Church to suffer drastically. In addition fewer men are joining the clergy which has recently made the average age of Catholic priests 63.

New City Catholic Church sites four huge reasons for this decline:

  • The Catholic church fails to use technology to its full potential to reach members,
  • they fail to create a welcoming and engaging environment in their parish communities,
  • they fail to use contemporary music, homilies, etc. to better relate to people causing church members to feel a disconnect between the Church and the world in which they live, and
  • they fail to use good design which causes churches to appear boring and unprofessional.

And I am sure it’s not just Catholics. I have two friends who tell me it feels the same way in their Presbyterian churches as well; and as a pastor without a call, this saddens me. With each passing year I see more young pastors starting churches from scratch – simply because it’s easier than trying to change the tides of their older predecessors.  I remember when people would say, “you’re crazy” when the discussion went to planting a church. “Do you know how hard it is?” critics would say.

Now, it seems it’s even crazier to try to make an old church…young again. The older generations and older denominations seem just fine with fading into history.

So if there really is no going back, can I at least offer one piece of advice? While beautiful stained glass (fully paid for) buildings sit empty, new start up churches pay thousands in rent to schools and warehouses. This seems ridiculous and wasteful. If you are in a dying church (and you know who you are) can you at least offer your sanctuary to a young start up – FREE of charge? I’m sure your small congregation could fit in the chapel now, or perhaps you’re all early risers and you’re done with the building by ten anyway? Find that budding church in the neighborhood and help them out.  Even if you don’t like bluejeans and Chris Tomlin, that doesn’t mean you can’t “adopt” a community. Who knew death was the perfect time to plant a church?

And the same goes for you young entrepreneurial churches as well – stop throwing your money away on rent! Go church shopping instead! Send out scouts to all the older churches in the area and begin asking to be “let in.” Don’t let denominational lines bother you – plead your case.

If we can’t inherit the  heritage, liturgy or the beautiful hymns, can we at least pass down the real estate?

And I am sorry if that sound too harsh, I feel like the greedy grandson staring down at the death bed asking for the family home, but I think the flag is on the field (is that the right metaphor? I am not a sports guy). But I think Stephen King said it best (yes, I am quoting Stephen King now) through his character Andy Dufresne in The Shawshank Redemption, “Get busy living, or get busy dying.”

The way I see it you got two choices… (and yes, I am talking to the dying churches again).

Either you can grow younger, get on facebook, let priests marry and burn those robes and pipe organs… or step aside and let a younger church have a fighting chance.

Jesus’ great commission doesn’t say anything about worship style, liturgical dress or using technology, in fact someone could probably make a pretty good case (COUGH! PAUL!) that we should be seeking to unite the Church of Christ more than divide it.

I will leave you with a story from Aesop, who was another brilliant literati (although he’s no Stephen King).

The Four Oxen and the Lion

A lion used to prowl about a field in which four oxen used to dwell. Many a time he tried to attack them; but whenever he came near they turned their tails to one another, so that whichever way he approached them he was met by the horns of one of them. At last, however, they fell a-quarrelling among themselves, and each went off to pasture alone in a separate corner of the field. Then the Lion attacked them one by one and soon made an end of all four.

United We Stand; Divided We Fall

* The author has nothing against robes and pipe organs, but felt the image was vivid so he ran with it.


Apr 26 2010

Shooting fish in a barrel…

Pescados

The term “shooting fish in a barrel” usually refers to something that was super easy . . . and perhaps a little cruel. It’s used when Carney folk sucker rubes into a game of chance or when unruly hill folk swindle city slickers into purchasing their snake oil (or so I have heard).  And I would offer that it would be just as easy to catch fish in a barrel using your hands, or even using a fishing rod, but to use a gun… seems a little lazy… don’t you think?

Heck, if the fish are in a barrel all you gotta do is drill a hole in the bottom and slowly let the water out; in a few minutes you’ll have dry fish.

This last Sunday my wife and I went to a new church, and I could easily say that everything was nice. The sanctuary was nice; the music was nice the pastor did a nice job. And my wife and I both did our best not to be uber critical, but I couldn’t help but notice something.

Shouldn’t greeting guests be like shooting fish in a barrel?

I always get ahead of myself, let me back up.

In having the chance to visit so many churches these past months, it’s very apparent that every church is operating with the same set of blocks. Somewhere, sometime when a church decides to be a community, they buy a starter kit that comes with a big cross, a set of communion trays, offering bags, a box of pre-beaten hymnals and then each church gets a set of “service order blocks” that they can arrange in any order:

□        Worship

□        Sermon

□        Offering

□        Announcements

□        Welcome

□        Communion (optional)

Then somewhere during the week the worship team and the pastor arranges these blocks in a particular order and they begin to get ready for Sunday. So when I as the visitor come in and sit down, and as the service gets on its way, I begin to notice “what order” the blocks are arranged in. “Oh, I like how they had announcements during the offering,” I whisper to my wife.

The bottom line for every church has been the same: I leave talking about the sermon and the music because those are the only elements that I as a visitor interacted with. We judge churches by the arrangement of the blocks and the effectiveness of the “performers.”

But that should not be the sum total of a guest experience. Churches I visit begin to blur together because I only remember the colors of the walls, that one pastor with the cool glasses, the worship pastor who clapped through every song or the church with the bulletin that I couldn’t figure out how to open…

I do have one advantage however; I have a toddler. And this is where my point will begin to solidify so get ready. Lately I have begun to remember the churches based on the nursery – but not because of program or service. I remember nurseries because that is where a church member is forced (I chose that word purposely) to talk to me. I remember churches based on where I was spoken to; and at the nursery you are forced to say, “This is Timmy (not my son’s real name) and it’s our first time here.”

… and then here comes the “shooting fish in a barrel” easy moment…

“Well Welcome.” says the nursery worker.

That couple just gave your entire church an infrared bull’s-eye for the rest of the morning. Get on the CB and call the welcome squad! Don’t wait for them to make initial contact again…

□        Someone bring them coffee

□        Go get the pastor from backstage to come out and welcome them.

□        Find an age appropriate couple to walk over and say, “hi.”

□        Someone from the welcome table bring them a welcome packet.

□        Give them a tour of the church after service

□        Offer to buy them lunch

A visitor just walked onto your campus of their own volition without any provocation from you – and you are just going to let them wander around and leave without first saying something?

C’mon! It’s like shooting fish in a barrel!

A retail store wouldn’t let that happen. Even if a customer says, “I’m just looking” a store clerk will continue to ask questions, and stay close by.

They came to you – it’s too easy!

But David,” you might be thinking. “…not every visitor has kids. How can I as a good church member begin to acknowledge visitors? I am too afraid I am going to ruin someone’s experience or misdiagnose who is a guest and who isn’t.”

That’s ok made up question asker; it’s not your fault.

It’s the fault of your leaders.

Greeting guests can be as easy as shooting fish in a barrel, but if your leaders have not given you the gun – then you’re not equipped. So do me a favor… run and go get your church leaders and bring them back here to read this article… ok? I will wait….

You got them?

You need to equip each church member as a “minister” of the church. Ephesians 4:11 says, “It was Jesus who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers..” notice that every word in this verse is plural. There is no single apostle, no single teacher and no single pastor. The church is filled with men and women who serve. If you empower people and give them tools, they will be emboldened to take risks and to act on their own.

Here are my suggestions for greeter training.

  1. Every member is a greeter and a member of the hospitality team: if this were your home, you wouldn’t let strangers walk around; and you wouldn’t feel nervous about asking them questions. It’s every member’s job to help lost people, crying kids, answer questions, and direct foot traffic.
  2. Every member is a trash picker-upper. Again, if this were your home you wouldn’t walk by a random magazine or crooked picture. Every Sunday guests are coming over, so everyone is in charge of keeping the church looking good.
  3. Every member should know where to find the information. This doesn’t mean everyone knows all the answers, but they should know how to find the answers. Maybe designated greeters and ushers have cheat sheets in their pockets, maybe there is a centralized map with times, maybe the bulletin has the answers, or maybe you have a welcome booth –  regardless. Never say to a visitor, “I don’t know” and walk away. Every member should be able to say, “You know, I am not sure, but I know exactly how to find out for you.”
  4. Give members permission to eavesdrop and look for non-verbal cues. Teach your members what to look for. The couple with the baby walking past the nursery, the person reading building signs, and the guy holding the church map upside down. Also feel free to eavesdrop – if the people in front of you look new… stop talking and lean in… what are they saying? If you can decipher that they are new – ask them if there is anything you can help them with, or if you can answer any questions.
  5. Designated greeters and ushers should always be smiling, standing and using open and welcoming body language. These people need to be the most obvious and the most assessable. This means greeters who are not talking about the party last night, or sitting in chairs, or wearing dark sunglasses, or reading, or straightening paper work…
  6. Always use visitor friendly language from the stage and often talk about how to get involved or how to become a member. Visitors may not be up on your “insider lingo” so always preface things with an explanation. “In a few weeks our culture vulture group is getting together, and this will be a special time for our ladies over 60 who enjoy…”

(Do you see what I mean? Before I said who the event was for, you wanted to go didn’t you?)

The most important person in the sanctuary is the person you have not met; so everything needs to be done with them in mind. You need to build a community that is welcoming, friendly, over communicative, and clean. In fact, I am willing to bet that a church could grow at a healthy pace solely through an organized program that targeted the people who physically walked on campus.

And more people walk onto your campus then just Sunday morning. Every Wedding and funeral is a chance to shoot fish in a barrel. Yes, I am serious. More often than not these are people who rarely set foot in a church. Now more than ever is your chance to have a clean campus, have volunteer welcomers in the parking lot directing foot traffic (wearing church name tags). Clean out the pew racks and place special  “getting to know us” leaflets in the pockets.

And there are lots of other ways to get people to walk onto campus of their own free will. Offer free classes to the community, offer empty classrooms to local schools, Cub Scout groups and AA meetings. If your campus sits dark at any time – it is a resource your church has that is going unused.

Find creative ways to bring more people to you; and then always have a clean campus, friendly people and obvious keys to help people get more information. And I bet you’ll find it’s exactly like shooting fish in… ya you get the picture.


Apr 19 2010

Finding your Muse…

The nine sisters identified as the Greek Muses were the daughters of Zeus and of Mnemosyne (the goddess of memory). Together they lived on Mount Helicon and were said to inspire all artists, poets, scientists, philosophers, and musicians. Each of the nine sisters was muse to a different field of inspiration and so depending on your area of interest, you would pray to the muse of your profession. Hence the proper thing to do when complimented or praised was to quickly give credit to your “inspiration” or “muse” thus diverting worship off of yourself onto the God who spoke through you.

I love mythology.

And I suppose as technology advances and evolves; the tools for creativity and inspiration increase as well. And as a pastor who uses the web and social media a lot, I am often forced to think about how technology and preaching come together. Most recently I have been thinking about the idea of the “borrowed” or “paid for ” sermon. There are several great sites out there for pastors to get fully written sermons and even greater software that will help them find it all. There are also mega churches and mega pastors who give away their graphics and resources for free to anyone who knows where to look.

CONFESSION TIME: When I was a youth pastor I stole stuff left and right, and a lot of the bigger more popular leaders used to encourage it, “You don’t have time to run a youth group, get to know kids on a personal level and develop quality curriculum” we were always told. And at the time, I didn’t think about it and I didn’t feel bad about it. There has always been a church tradition that the Sunday School teachers taught out of a workbook or from bought curriculum.

But what about the senior pastor? Where do they draw inspiration from? I was listening to Rob Bell one week and he was telling his church about meeting a pastor who basically confessed, “All I do is download your sermon from the previous week, transcribe it and preach it to my church the following week.”

I guess there is always a line somewhere and so the question then becomes, “where is it?” Pastors have always borrowed from others when putting a sermon together, they borrow each other’s stories, quotes, examples,  videos, and jokes – but how much “borrowing” is too much? At what point (if ever) does it become stolen? And if one is borrowing, should they always give credit, or is the negligence in passing it off as your own inspiration?

This raises even more questions…

- What about work overload? If a pastor has a lot on his schedule, is it OK to borrow inspiration once in a while? Or what if there is a pastor who just admits that preaching is not their strength? Does using a downloaded sermon become the same as delegating the work to those more gifted?

- What about those in the congregation? The talk around coffee after church is always “didn’t you love the sermon?” or “It was such a lovely message today.” Does anything change for you once you find out that your pastor just downloaded the series from the internet? Can the morning message still have meaning to you, or does it loose something if you begin to wonder if your pastor just “reads other people’s work?”

I guess as a pastor who has always borrowed from others I still don’t have a place to stand on this subject, so I throw it out to you. What do you think about the questions posed here? Is there a line? And if there is… where is it?


Apr 18 2010

The Blue Parakeet

I’ve said it before, I am the most critical critic ever; so what I am about to say is bathed in bias. My wife is an ordained minister and I don’t know what kind of  goosebumps that sends through your spine, but I happen to be one who believes in the equality for women in ministry.

The other day, I was listening to a very popular pastor and author on podcast who was preaching the opposite message to his church.  Women were not allowed to be pastors and elders in his church and the reason he stated was because of Jesus and the bible.

To be fair his sermon topic was actually about discipleship (or ministry, I wasn’t quite sure) and he had other points, but my problem was that he focussed a lot on the fact that women were not equals in this community.

But let me go back a step – his first point was “calling.” Pastors and people in ministry are called by God and he stressed that often people are NOT called, but that they go into ministry anyway and burn out. He said that anyone can go to seminary, but only people are who are called by God to the profession will find success. But there was never any “scripture backing” for this point and there was never any “test” to see if you had been called; he simply said “you need to be called.”

But since his following point was: “you get the men;” I guess he assumes a women can’t be called. I’d like him to explain that to a room of women pastors who have felt the calling. Or perhaps a woman can feel called,  but once they approach the system a man can tell her that she is only destined to be a children’s director.

I feel like I could go all over the place with this and I want to stay focussed, so I’ll try to say only a few things.

The Pastor said that at his church they try to follow what Jesus did and to copy that system – Jesus had 12 male apostles and since Jesus called men, only men can be called. Nobody can argue this is true, but let’s first admit that regardless of “what we copy” from scripture, we also choose to ignore stuff as well. And the bible does not indicate what to do and what not to do – WE draw those lines.  And no matter what reasons we use – we still approach the bible with a filter. So just saying, “well Jesus did it” isn’t good enough. Because Jesus did lots of things that we don’t do.

Second, Jesus wasn’t running a church. Jesus had a ministry that does not look like any church I have ever seen and during his time on earth he never said, “this is how you do it.”

Author Scott McKnight wrote a book called The Blue Parakeet that arguably is one of the best books I have ever read on biblical reading and interpretation.  The last third of his book is a clear break down of what the bible says regarding women in ministry. I would encourage everyone to read this book regardless of what your own personal thoughts are. Professor McKnight writes these words…

I ask not “WWJD?” but “WDWD?” (What Did Women Do?) And the pressing question we ask is this: Does your church permit and promote women to do in your church what women did in the Bible? Can a church be biblical (faithfully Protestant) if it does not permit and promote women to do now at least as much as they did in the Bible and in the early churches? Do you know what Miriam did? what Deborah did? what Huldah did? what Mary did? what Phoebe did? what Junia did? what Priscilla did? Are they the models of what women can do in your church? If not, why not?”

When we discuss the role of women in ministry we must be, as McKnight contends, willing to hear the entire biblical story.

Dr. Thomas Schreiner is the Professor of New Testament Interpretation and Associate Dean of Scripture and Interpretation at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. And this is what he says about Scott McKnight’s study on women in ministry.

“The substance of McKnight’s argument is his appeal to the actual ministries of women in both the OT and the NT. This is familiar ground in the debate which has been rehearsed many times. McKnight does not actually argue from the “that was then and this is now” principle, which we expect him to do from the earlier part of the book. Instead, he appeals to the ministry of women in the OT and the NT. Apparently, in this instance his argument is that women always served in all ministry positions, and hence they should continue to do so today. So, strictly speaking, the concluding section of the book does not represent an application of the hermeneutical thesis propounded earlier, and is not a legitimate case-study of what was propounded earlier in the book. In other words, when it comes to women in ministry, McKnight’s argument is women “were in ministry then, and they should be in ministry now.”

It’s still amazing to me that educated people are still trying to enforce a male dominated church in the twenty-first century. (and even more amazing that the women LET THEM!) They lift up the words of Paul and ignore the teachings of Jesus and the prophets.

And I am sure these same men would be against scripture twisting and lifting verses out of context, but that is exactly what they are doing by continuing to deny women the same rights that they are claiming.

A calling in ministry.

And let’s not ignore the message this continues to perpetuate to an outside world. The church is a homophobic, male-dominated, judgmental and negative system with a political agenda.  And whether or not these claims of the church are true of all churches or of any single church, the reality is not to be ignored.

These perceptions will continue to be a significant barrier.

Jesus elevated the weak and the marginalized. Jesus destroyed social barriers and he tested “time held” traditions. But more importantly Jesus came with a message of love and equality. If we wanted we could build a church that spent the whole day flipping tables and making whips – Jesus did those things too. But i’d rather show the world the Jesus that I think is the most important – the Jesus who didn’t cast children, or women or the sick or the broken away.

But rather embraced the world, taught crowds, discipled losers and touched the unlovable.


Apr 15 2010

The death of emergence…

Only death remains.

I guess I am always the last to know, but apparently the emerging church has died. Sadly much before I could ever call myself an “emerging church pastor” our short lived church movement has come to a very quiet end. I guess  I’m still thinking about it, so I don’t have much to say yet, but please read these 3 “obituaries” and share what you think…

1. Cheaper than Therapy – The Emerging Church, A Controversial movement inspiring many the past 10 years, Dies at 21

2. Tall Skinny Wiki Emerging Church Movement (1989 – 2009)?

3. World Mag.com -Farewell emerging church, 1989-2010


Apr 10 2010

The diversity of Heaven…

IMG_7286

So I don’t know if you have heard about a new church evangelism campaign going around right now that focuses on the biblical idea of the “extended household.” It’s the concept that there are always a cloud of people that you interact with that you could be influencing and thus inviting to your church.

  • The girl who pours your coffee in the morning
  • Your next door neighbor
  • Your brother who only goes to church 2x a year
  • A co-worker

All of these people are members of your extended household and could be in your prayers as you wait for the right moment to invite them to church. And don’t get me wrong it’s a successful program; several churches have seen lucrative growth from implementing this “friend cloud” style evangelism. And certainly we can’t bad mouth any development in the continuing effort to grow the kingdom of God. And yes, we do see this “household” evangelism in many places in scripture (Acts 18:8).

But I guess the reason I am writing this morning is… even though there is nothing wrong with this program and even though we see a sampling of it in the scriptures… my question is – is this the message that Christ brought? Did Jesus come with a message of “let’s save our friends?” Should our churches be filled with people who look like us and think like us? Because I would argue that the American church already looks like that.

I am reminded that this same question was brought before Jesus.

Luke 10: 25-29

On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”

He answered: ” ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”

“You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

In the beginning there is a lawyer, but not just a lawyer, a proposed expert in Levitical law. In other words, this is a theologian. And he is asking Jesus how to take hold of the Kingdom of God; and Jesus answers in classic Hebraic fashion, answering a question with a question. But even after this theologian responds correctly, he pushes it further and asks Jesus the lynch pin question.

“Who is my neighbor?” and if you know the story, what does Jesus answer with? “It’s your friends,” says Jesus. “It’s the eight to fifteen people in your cloud of influence.”

No, he didn’t say that – and I think THAT was the answer that the Jews expected to hear.

Why? Because right now the Jews are surrounded by enemies. There are literally people groups on every side that the average Jew… hates. And the easy way out would be to say, “Love your friends.”

But Jesus answers with the parable known as the Good Samaritan. And the funny thing is, that phrase “Good Samaritan” has become an expression for anyone who does a good deed. But that was not how the parable was meant to be heard. Each person walking the road to Jericho was probably Jewish. Jesus was telling this story to a largely Jewish audience.

In the story, the first would-be helper is a priest and the next a Levite – and rather than help a fellow Hebrew… each man opts out and chooses not to defile himself and walks on by. You see it’s not so much that they didn’t want to get involved, or that they were jerks, it’s just that the man in the road appeared to be dead (v.30) and neither traveler wanted to “dirty his hands” by helping out a “friend.” So the last man to walk down the road naturally should be a typical Hebrew. He should be ‘Joe the Plummer’ or the girl who pours your coffee…

Are we on the same page?

But Jesus pulls a 180 and says that the last man coming down the road is a Samaritan; basically a half-breed. But not just any child of two races, no the Samaritans were the “extermination project” of the Assyrian empire. And for a Jew, nothing was more important than their racial identity – they were the “chosen people.” They were exclusive.

We read in the Mishna Shebiith 8:10 “He that eats the bread of the Samaritans is like to one that eats the flesh of swine”

And in W.O.E. Oesterley’s book: The Gospel Parables In The Light Of Their Jewish Background writes, “The Samaritans were publicly cursed in the synagogues; and a petition was daily offered up praying to God that the Samaritans might not be partakers of eternal life.”

But in Jesus’ parable, it’s the Samaritan (not the Jew) who is the one who stops, touches the half-dead man, and is friend and neighbor; and at the end of his lesson Jesus asks,

v.36″Which of these three (men) do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

…silence….

v37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”

Notice he doesn’t say “the Good Samaritan.”(ha ha) Because remember there are people in Jesus’ day who are literally praying that the Samaritans not receive eternal life – this is their daily prayer  - to God!!!! And Jesus comes and says, “Those are the people I want you to love.”

Who is your neighbor?

“Your enemy.”

Jesus preached a message of “love your enemy.” It was one of his main thesis statements.

Matthew 5:39-42

Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Matthew 5:43

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

Luke 6:35
“Love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High.”

And check this out, Jesus even says….

Matthew 10:34-36

“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn ” ‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law – (and) a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.”

Wait? What’s that? Who does Jesus say is a member of your household? Who should you be considering in your friendship style evangelism?

Your enemies.

I was reminded this last week during lent that Jesus said in Matthew 12:38-40

“Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you.” (and Jesus) said to them in reply, “An evil and unfaithful generation seeks a sign, but no sign will be given it except the Sign of Jonah the prophet.”

Well that leads you to ask, What is the sign of Jonah? Isn’t that the big fish story? Yea, but that book is a lot bigger than some Sunday School veggie tales cartoon.  The entire book is a story about evangelism – but not the kind an average Jew would have expected. Jonah isn’t asked to tell the story of God to his friends and neighbors he is asked to tell the God story to his enemies… and he said, “no.”

But even after Jonah is “convinced” to do this task, he still sits on the mountain in chapter four to watch Nineveh burn and it never happens.  The book of Jonah ends with God explaining to Jonah that his concern is the restoration of creation. God loves Jonah’s enemies and he wants Jonah to love them too. And then thousands of years later, Jesus compares what he is doing with what Jonah was doing…

Can you imagine a church program centered on loving your enemies?

Because here is the take away for me. If I bring my friends to church then the church continues to be a place that looks like me, sounds like me and represents my ideals and ultimately…  I don’t have to change. Sure I may feel good, my church grows and more people become Jesus followers… all of these things are good… no, all of these things are GREAT!

But …what has to change when I start reaching out to my enemies? First I have to ask, “Who is my enemy?” and then if I can answer that question, I have to admit that I have enemies. AND THEN – I have to begin breaking that wall down.

To win my enemies, to make my enemy – my friend…

I have to change.

All of this reminds me of a quote I read in Brian McLaren’s book, Everything Must Change.

“At the center of the beloved community is good news – a framing story that calls humanity to creativity, harmony, reconciliation, justice, virtue, integrity, and peace, because these values reflect the character of the Creator whose world is our home and in whose presence we live and move and have our being. In short: we are all part of one kingdom, one beautiful whole, with one caring Creator, who is faithful to us even in our stupidity and sin. God calls us to reconcile with God, one another, and creation, to defect from the false stories that divide and destroy us, and to join God in the healing of the world through love and the pursuit of justice and the common good” (page 295).

McLaren said the church should be diverse because our God is diverse. And I love where he says that we are called, “..to reconcile with God, one another, and creation, to defect from the false stories that divide and destroy us.”

And let me just repeat again: there is nothing wrong with friendship style evangelism, I think a huge argument could be made that we are each responsible for our moral proximately. But at the same time, I think the church should begin making strides towards loving all people and embracing all people. Or as Mr. McLaren said better that me, we should “join God in the healing of the world through love and the pursuit of justice and the common good.”

I think a church that adopts those ideals will begin to look more like the Kingdom of God.

Revelation 5:9-10

They sang a new song, saying:  ”You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God members of every tribe and language and people and nation. You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign (Greek – actively participate) on the earth.”

The author of revelation is living in a world where people are segregated, by race, tribe and class. And he is noticing that in the company of God, all kinds of people are there. The words that John uses in the Greek are:

  • Tribe – [fulon] this means “race, tribe or class”
  • Language – [glossa] this means tongue or speech
  • People – [lous] this means ‘common people’ or the masses. This is where we get the word “laity.”
  • Nation – [ethnos] this means ethnicity

John’s Revelation is a Kingdom comprised of the entire world worshiping God.

In Heaven, everyone is a majority – all are equal. John stresses this four times in four different ways; and I think this is central to what John is trying to say. Heaven is unbelievably diverse. It doesn’t look like the Middle East, and it doesn’t look like America. In fact, Heaven doesn’t look like anywhere, because nowhere looks like heaven. In heaven the people sing a new song.

And this idea is not exclusive to Revelation – this is a constant theme of the bible.

Psalm 117:1-2

Praise the LORD, all you nations; extol him, all you peoples. For great is his love toward us, and the faithfulness of the LORD endures forever. Praise the LORD.

I said at the beginning that friendship evangelism was a new program, but in truth it’s not new either. I would argue that the world already tells us to love our friends and to look out for the next door neighbor and the girl who pours our coffee. From a very young age it seems we are all indoctrinated with the idea that we should only welcome those who look and sound like us.

But that message is not new.

That message is stale and lifeless.

Jesus came with a truly new message and said, “Everything you’ve heard is backwards. Stop with the racist jokes, stop the gay-bashing, stop excluding, stop clicks, stop huddling up, stop privilege, stop hording surplus, stop ignoring the stranger, and start loving one another.”

But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

  • The Muslim
  • The homosexual
  • The rapist
  • The addict
  • The homeless

God loves your enemies. Jesus died for your enemies.

So maybe a better question is, “Who ISN’T my neighbor?” Because if we all live in a world where we have to define who and who not to love – that’s back to being in the world of exclusion. “We must step down off our soapboxes and love those whom we have deemed so unlovable. It will change them – and, oh yes it will change us.” ~ Mark Steele

The gospel is not about exclusion.

Or walls

Or edges

There is no outside

There is just inside – and we’re all in it.

And Jesus says, “Go and do likewise.”


Apr 7 2010

The Corrective Lens…

readers on white table

So I have been wrestling with something for a little while now and I want to toss it out to you to get some different views… As a pastor and religious leader, I would argue that a lot of the time we are held to a certain extent as an “authority.” And as an authority I think sometimes we are asked to validate and confirm truths or fictions concerning the bible and theology. People will always approach us as the corrective lens.

For example: I was in my book reading class the other week and someone had asked about the camel going through the eye of a needle (Matthew 25) and it was mentioned that someone had read that Jesus is speaking of an actual door in the Jerusalem wall that was named “the eye of the needle.” To which my teacher matter-of-factly said “it’s not true.”

“Yes it is” said the student

“No it’s not.” said my Professor.

“Yes it is” said the student.

“No,” said my Professor “there is no historical evidence of this. It is more than likely an urban legend fabricated within the last few hundred years.” In other words, it’s a “nice story,” but it’s not true.

Even more recently, my own family this last week was telling me about their church’s Easter service. Apparently the pastor was talking about the burial clothes mentioned in John 20:7 and he commented that because the burial “napkin” was folded – this was a reference to Jews who folded their dinner napkins after a meal to indicate “it is finished.” I thought this was a great insight and went home to study it.

What did I discover? Well, not only were napkins not even invented until the 18th century – but also that the “folded napkin theory” actually started as an internet email back in 2007. In other words, it’s a “nice story,” but it’s not true.

Not to mention the numerous verses that we as Christians lift out of context and perpetuate on gift cards (i.e. Jeremiah 29:11) and inspirational sentiment.

So my question to you is… what do we do?

As the authority is it our job or duty to squelch the story when we hear it? Do we (as my teacher did) sharply say, “Yea, I have heard that also, but it’s not true.” Because on the one hand, I don’t want my friends and family members to now perpetuate a biblical falsehood – but at the same time… who cares? I mean, it’s not a pivotal salvation issue. What is more important? The “idea” they took away on Easter Sunday or the facts?

Sometimes I think we as leaders also need to “censor” what we teach.

I mean, I learned a lot of stuff in seminary that I would never teach from the pulpit, partly because I wouldn’t want to either a) scare people or b) radically destroy traditions they have held all of their lives.

As a teacher my responsibility isn’t just to “educate” or to separate fact from fiction. Or is it?

Maybe the answer lies in how we are approached. If someone says, “I recently heard that the colt Jesus rode into town on was actually a horse… is that true?” Perhaps then we have “permission” to respond?

Should I as the corrective lens always discern the ‘clear’ truth? Or is it better sometime to ‘allow’ a fuzzy world-view?

I would really love to start this discussion and hear your own stories and understandings…


Apr 1 2010

Beware of False Pizza

Zachary's Pizza award winning poster

This is a recent quote I came across in my morning blog reading, I have removed the names to protect the accused (ha ha)….

“ (this woman) was invited to speak at the pagan shrine in (said town) recently. The shrine to the gods is headed by emergent guru (unnamed pastor), and was host to (this woman) who quoted all kinds of “Christian” mystics and heretics–but precious little Scripture. In fact, (this woman) calls those of us who do believe the truth of Scripture “fools” for daring to examine the filth she is spewing.”

…Yikes! Sounds biting, but I am sure the blogger is a faithful Christian who is trying their best to warn others about perhaps the dangers of following this specific heretical teaching. But when you read the quote lifted from the body of the article these words don’t sound very “Christian.”  Or maybe they do… I don’t know.

So even though I am very familiar with both of these people, have read their books and listened to their teaching I did a little homework just to see what their reputations looked like in more professional circles. Rather than take this person’s claims at face value I did my own background check into these two unnamed heretics.

The pastor of the “pagan shrine” was recently called “the next Billy Graham” by the Chicago Sun times and is pastor to one of the fastest growing churches in U.S. history, drawing more than 10,000 worshippers each week (plus another 3,000 or so who download sermons from the web.) He has authored 4 books, made over 40 videos, made several public speaking tours and is easily one of the most sought after minds in the new church movement today.

And the woman in this quote is the founding editor of the Religion Department of PUBLISHERS WEEKLY, the international journal of the book industry, is frequently quoted in print sources like USA TODAY, CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, NY TIMES as well as in electronic media like PBS, NPR, and THE HALLMARK CHANNEL, (oooh she sounds dangerous) She is an authority on religion in America and is a much sought after lecturer.

Very different isn’t it? It’s interesting to me that a well known and respectful Christian who many follow and listen to… can also be called a heretic, or a blasphemer. And I am sure that we have all heard worse! I have heard good meaning Christians call some pastors and leaders “the anti-Christ!” Or I have heard some people say, “That person is the devil himself.” And so we throw these words around like apostate, heretic, and blasphemer at other Christians – and sometimes even from the pulpit or from other public platforms where we have the power to influence others.

And I think what happens is we read a lot of the verses telling us to watch out for false teachers and false prophets and so we indoctrinate ourselves as the “Jesus police.” We break out our own soap box, make some cardboard signs and we are quick to begin diverting traffic away from these apparent heathens.

I love the movie Elf with Will Farrell. Very early on in the move, Santa gives Buddy the elf some advice about going to New York City and he says, “…There are, like, thirty Ray’s Pizzas. They all claim to be the original. But the real one’s on 11th.”

And if you visit New York it may seem like there are several Ray’s Pizzerias.  But if you look closely each has a different name. There is “Ray’s Original Pizza,” “Famous Ray’s Pizza,” “World-Famous Original Ray’s Pizza;” and they are all names of dozens of restaurants in New York that are completely independent but have similar menus, signs and logos.

And Santa was saying to Buddy, “Watch out! There is false pizza everywhere.”

And while some people might have “good intentions,” I get super bent out of shape when I hear Christians and pastors speak out and speak down against other Christians. I don’t know where we find the time to belittle each other, or to tear each other down in front of a watching world. I just don’t know if that’s the healthy and right things to do; and I wonder what the bible has to say about it.

Because certainly these are not NEW issues – the idea of false teaching and leading people astray has been around since the beginning. Look at Deuteronomy…

Deuteronomy 13:6-11

If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, “Let us go and worship other gods” (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people. Stone him to death, because he tried to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again.

This is the old covenant law and it seems pretty clear – if someone is preaching a gospel of fake pizza… kill them. Life’s too short. Right?  To keep the purity of Israel, and to control the spread of false doctrine, a slap on the wrist is not enough – people need to see and feel the weight of how important this is. And the punishment sounds harsh, but I can appreciate the intention: God’s word must be kept right and pure and uncontaminated. And people who willfully try to take someone away from that should be punished. In effect, these are God’s children – and this passage is essentially saying, “There are kidnappers in your midst.”

So Moses warns the people– “…if someone tries to lure you away from God, from this family… don’t waste your breath. Get rid of them….”

Peter says something similar.

2 Peter 2:1-3

There were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.

The word Peter uses here for “false teachers” is the Greek word pseudodidaskalos and it strangely enough means “false teacher.” Psudeo means fake and didaskalos means teacher.

Interesting enough, this is actually the ONLY time that the phrase false teacher appears in the Greek New Testament. So I wanted to closely look at Luke 9 today and read perhaps how this might look though the lens of Jesus….

Luke 9:1-2

When Jesus had called the Twelve together, he gave them power and authority to drive out all demons and to cure diseases, and he sent them out to preach the kingdom of God and to heal the sick.

So Jesus sets twelve people aside – and gives them his permission –and his authority to carry the “Jesus label” out into the world.

So look down at vs. 46

An argument started among the disciples as to which of them would be the greatest. Jesus, knowing their thoughts, took a little child and had him stand beside him. Then he said to them, “Whoever welcomes this little child in my name welcomes me; and whoever welcomes me welcomes the one who sent me. For he who is least among you all—he is the greatest.”

I hear this verse lifted out by children’s pastors a lot. It’s used as an example of how Jesus loved kids. But in this example Jesus isn’t showing his great affection for children, he is in effect taking a member of society who was very low on the social scale – and saying: if you want to be great in the kingdom, you will notice the ones who won’t bring you a higher status. Care for the outcast and take the unseen jobs. Jesus is in effect turning what might seem the right way and turning it on its head.

If you want to get ahead in the world today, you don’t hang out in the mail room, or become best friends with the messenger boys; you don’t talk to the janitor or the guy who fixes the copy machine. If you want the boss to notice you – you pick jobs that get you noticed. So when the chosen twelve are arguing about who is better than who – Jesus straightens them out and says, “It’s not the ones who are trying to be noticed and seen. It’s not the ones whose goal it is to get ahead… who get ahead.”

Look at verse…49

“Master,” said John, “we saw a man driving out demons in your name and we tried to stop him, because he is not one of us.”

“Do not stop him,” Jesus said, “for whoever is not against you is for you.”

So first the disciples are jealous of one another – and now it seems they are jealous of an outsider.  This guy is on his own – doing his own thing – he doesn’t have Jesus’ permission or authority. The disciples are saying, “he’s not in the club, so shouldn’t we stop him – speak against him – undermine him – post scandalous blogs about him…. We certainly can’t allow him to become greater than us.”

So what does Jesus say in verse 50?

“Do not stop him,” Jesus said, “for whoever is not against you is for you.”

Obviously this is a guy who has not benefited from being a close disciple of Christ. The disciples don’t know him. And by saying that he was not “one of them” they were calling him an “apostate.”

Apostasy is what we call people who have left the faith either by their own volition or who we deem “too radical” to be included. The word derives from the Greek αποστασία (apostasia), meaning a defection or revolt, from απο, apo, “away, apart”, στάσις, stasis, “stand”, “standing”. It literally means someone who “stands over there.”

Apostasy is an “outsider.”

How ironic that this teaching follows the former. Jesus just got through telling them that to be great in the Kingdom; they should welcome those who stand on the outside – those on the fringes.

And who stands on the outside? Pastors who are not our pastors, churches who are not ours, denominations who are not ours…. Authors we don’t read. Theologians who teach things we don’t believe. Leaders who aren’t members of our political affiliation. And Jesus says,

“Do not stop them… whoever is not against you is for you.”

And I think for some strange reason we each think that someone who we don’t line up with theologically must be wrong and therefore against us and against God.  But are they really against us? Just because we don’t recognize their authority or perhaps some of their doctrine seems edgy to us, does that mean that they are against God?

And maybe you could argue, “But there are some people / groups that are preaching damnable heresy – shouldn’t we stop them – belittle them – dehumanize them – protest them – carry picket signs – call them names? Spread the word through email chain letters? Peter says to watch out for false teachers!”

True – but, look at what Paul says…

Philippians 1:15-18

It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. The latter do so in love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains. But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.

So just like 2 Peter, there is a statement about people who preach Christ for the wrong motives. But a close reading of Peter doesn’t actually say what to do… it’s more of a personal warning. But Paul takes it a step further and says “…but who cares?”

Who cares????

Is that really the Christian stance we should take? Let’s keep reading Jesus.

Luke 9 a little further down – vs 51

As the time approached for him to be taken up to heaven, Jesus resolutely set out for Jerusalem. And he sent messengers on ahead, who went into a Samaritan village to get things ready for him; but the people there did not welcome him, because he was heading for Jerusalem. When the disciples James and John saw this, they asked, “Lord, do you want us to call fire down from heaven to destroy them.

So here is another example of the hot headed disciples trying to “protect Jesus’ image.” First it was people on the outside doing things in Jesus’ name and now it’s gentiles not being nice to Jesus. What? They dissed Christ? Not on my watch [rolls up sleeves] why I oughta….

But who does Christ rebuke? The Samaritans?

But Jesus turned and rebuked them, and they went to another village.

No… his own followers.

In Luke 9 – there are three instances of the disciples getting it wrong and on the third strike –Jesus has to take them by the arm and put them in a time out. Jesus said we need to have eyes to include the people on the outside and that just because we may not understand them, and just because thy don’t belong to our group, it doesn’t give us any ground to exclude or destroy them.

So we’ve looked at apostasy, let’s look real quick at blasphemy and heresy.

In Matthew 26 Jesus is taken to the Sanhedrin which was the ancient Jewish court system. There was one Great Sanhedrin which was the supreme religious body in the Land of Israel during the time of the Holy Temple. But in every city there were also smaller religious “Sanhedrins,” as well as a civil political-democratic “Sanhedrin.” The Sanhedrin was a political and judicial council headed by the country’s ruler. The Sanhedrin judged accused lawbreakers, but could not initiate arrests.

Matthew 26:59-

The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were looking for false evidence against Jesus so that they could put him to death. But they did not find any, though many false witnesses came forward.

Finally two came forward and declared, “This fellow said, ‘I am able to destroy the temple of God and rebuild it in three days.’ “

A typical trial required a minimum of two witnesses to convict a suspect. There were no attorneys. Instead, the accusing witness stated the offense in the presence of the accused and the accused could call witnesses on his own behalf. The court questioned the accused, the accusers and the defense witnesses. The Great Sanhedrin dealt with religious and ritualistic Temple matters, criminal matters appertaining to the secular court, proceedings in connection with the discovery of a corpse, trials of adulterous wives, tithes, preparation of Torah Scrolls for the king and the Temple, drawing up the calendar and the solving of difficulties relating to ritual law.

Continuing…

Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, “Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?” But Jesus remained silent.
The high priest said to him, “I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ,[

“Yes, it is as you say,” Jesus replied. “But I say to all of you: In the future you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.”

Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?”
“He is worthy of death,” they answered.

They accused Jesus of blasphemy. So what is blasphemy?

Greek – βλασφημέω Blasphemy is to speak poorly about, reproachfully, or to speak evil of.

The word means: βλασ”I injure” and φήμη = “reputation” – so when we blaspheme we injure God’s reputation. The disciples wanted to call down fire on the Samaritans because they felt Christ’s reputation had been injured. The Sanhedrin tore their clothes because they felt Christ comparing himself to God – slighted God.

This is why the disciples wanted to call down fire from heaven in Luke 9, they felt that the Samaritans had slighted God by injuring Christ’s reputation.

What about Heresy? Jesus is teaching those who have been following him in John 6:53-66 and he says… “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him.”

So that’s the teaching and listen to how the people responded…

On hearing it, many of his disciples said, “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?”

Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? What if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit. He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled him.”

From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.

The word “heresy” comes from the Greek hairetikos from the root haireisthai “to take” and it means “able to choose.” Heresy – is a controversial or novel change to a system of beliefs, especially a religion that conflicts with established dogma.

In other words heresy is teaching that takes you in a new direction and typically takes you away from your more traditionally held beliefs.

There is an ancient letter from Minucius Felix Octavius and how he reports that Christian recruits were given church membership after they ate a baby and drank its blood. It was a misunderstanding on the Lord’s Table. We understand that Jesus was not speaking literally about his followers consuming his body.

Was Jesus a blasphemer? The religious courts thought so and ultimately he was condemned to death by them.

Was Jesus a heretic? Some of his own disciples thought so – and there is no doubt that the things he spoke were controversial and that they presented a change to a long held system of beliefs. In fact the definition of a heretic isn’t necessarily a bad one.

It’s interesting that the religious courts needed 2 witness to condemn Jesus and the bible records that two were found. And what the witnesses said was almost true, although it was lifted out of context. And you know – anything spoken or written can be isolated – words can be lifted out of context – just as people can twist the scriptures – they can also twist the words of pastors and teachers.

So I think we need to be very careful about throwing around the word “Blasphemy” or “apostate” or “heretic” – because if the Holy Spirit works through an author, a pastor a book or a church – as soon as someone calls that “channel” blasphemy – you better duck.

And if our own Lord and Savior was called a blasphemer and a heretic… are those we give that label to in “bad company?”

A little application for us all. We will certainly come across people we don’t agree with and or teachers who appear to present a conflicting doctrine. How should we respond to false teachers?

1. Test it

1 John 4:1

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.

Matthew 7:1-5

“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.

2. Check yourself – before you wreck yourself

Matt 18-15-18

“If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.

3. Can I get a witness?

2 John 1:10

If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting,

Paul had a problem with Peter. Some people think that when Peter went to someone’s house – and was invited to eat, he would move away from the table and only eat with Jewish Christians and Paul thought that was wrong… so he wrote a blog about it

No… look at what Paul said…

Galatians 2:11

But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned.

Yep – “to his face.” So what happens if the guy you want to speak out against, or the woman you want to point fingers at is famous or lives in another city? How will you ever be able to get “in their face.”

Well I would argue that a pastor, or author or person that you don’t know – also doesn’t know you – and therefore they are not “against you.” Jesus rebukes his disciples for wanting to condemn strangers with a blanket “cover all” judgment.

The take away from this is the condemning language. Of course I am not saying that there are not people with crazy theology out there or certainly people who are steering the church to the extreme left or the extreme right of Christ.

I just don’t see Jesus condemning people…or people groups. I don’t think we have any right (or calling) to shout words of judgment outside our individual church walls. In fact, maybe that’s the only good thing about the walls – limit your condemnation and house cleaning to your own house.

Words are still powerful, words like “hate” get thrown around all too much especially if we don’t really mean it. What does the world hear when we as Christians say, “I hate this….?” Or “I hate that person..?”

Listen to a quote I came across from author Mark Steele in his latest book Christianish,

“We are quick to wax eloquent about how our own supposed righteousness contrasts against those whom we deem as the villains of the day – the problem being that this act of decrying people is the part of our faith walk that is most under the microphone. Our very public attacking words aimed at people (people Jesus loved and died for) who disagree with us is under a megaphone. And the world is using our most irate voices to define us.  They listen and they hear opinionated hatred, ignorance, antagonism, and of course hypocrisy – because we say our faith is one of love for all (humanity), but we say it with a voice that is spitting bile.”

We need to be cautious about calling pastors and authors, religious leaders and other denominations: heretical, blasphemers or apostate… unless we mean to say we consider them in the same boat as Jesus – in which case I agree.


Feb 26 2010

What is the Church? Eugene Peterson

St John Catholic Church

What is the church? Do you tend to idealized the earliest churches? But do you neglect then the deformities of those same churches?

“Church,” says Peterson, “is the textured context in which we grow up in Christ to maturity.”

“So, why church? The short answer is because the Holy Spirit formed it to be a colony of heaven in the country of death” (11-12).

Read the rest here: Practice Resurrection 2

Read the first article here: Practice Resurrection 1